Quantcast The Herald
College Media Network

SGA votes to combine shared governance committees

Camelia Trahan

Issue date: 9/11/08 Section: Campus
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Julie Isaacson, Chair of Governance Task Force, explains to the SGA the benefits of combining the shared governance committees.
Media Credit: Sarah Campbell
Julie Isaacson, Chair of Governance Task Force, explains to the SGA the benefits of combining the shared governance committees.

SGA voted in an emergency meeting Wednesday to combine the Institutional Governance Oversight Committee and the Academic Governance Oversight Committee into one, becoming the Shared Governance Oversight Committee.

Julie Isaacson and and Mike McDaniel, co-chairs of Governance Task Force, explained the difference between the two committees: the IGOC reviews institutional governance procedures and performance and functions as a committee on committees, while the AGOC serves as a liaison to the chancellor. It reviews academic governance procedures and performance and addresses issues and makes recommendations regarding policies/procedures contained in the Faculty Handbook.

"Shared governance is not authority and it is not power. Make no mistake that the absolute power and absolute authority for this university resides in Gov. Mike Beebe's office," McDaniel said. "He exercises that power and authority to appoint the Board of Trustees, and we all work with that Board of Trustees."

Senate members' main concern was whether or not they would lose a voice on the committee by combining them.

"With them having to merge both committees is great," Shunqetta Cunningham, graduate student senator, said. "But I, well some of us, still have some concerns about the proposal that was presented to us. I'm sure we, as a Senate, will get together and talk this over. Our main concern is not to lose student representation on these committees."

Many of the senate representatives that attended the meeting assumed it would mainly be an informational meeting and that they would not be rushed to vote on a proposal immediately. Isaacson assured them they were not losing a voice by voting today.

"I encourage you, the senate members, to get vocal, express your concerns, and to be the voice of the students," SGA President Ryan Beaird said.

When presented with the proposal earlier this month, the Staff Senate was not so keen on the proposed structure for the new SGOC. They argued it was not representative of the current constituency groups on campus.

However, the SGA voted unanimously in support of merging both oversight committees as one. Their plan is to review the proposal and make any recommendations deemed fitting to best represent the student body.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

News

Opinion

Entertainment

Sports

Campus

Advertisement

Poll

How much do you owe in credit card debt?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement